I think that web developers have a bit of a blind-spot regarding mobile. Mobile applications have brought back the need to create static sites.
Before mobile, static sites - at least large static sites - had largely gone the way of the dodo bird. Large websites today are created using a CMS or an MVC framework. Even if it is a simple site that doesn't use these, you can still use simple tools like server side includes which are available on every webserver.
Now, mobile has thrown a monkey-wrench at web developers. Once again, we need to be able to create large static sites.
So, you need some tools to manage that.
I would have thought that common tools for creating websites included this capability. I had a blind spot about this myself, since I was involved in some very early tools for creating large static sites.
----
Many years ago, (like 1995) I worked for a company called MediaShare. We had a product called ProductBase. It stored data about products in a database, and you could generate either a printed catalog (PageMaker) or a CD-ROM catalog (this was the Next Big Thing at the time...) It used templates to do this.
I had an interest in the emerging web, and I suggested to my boss that with a bit of effort, we could make it spit-out HTML pages as well. (I'd been hired on contract to do something completely different, and my task was complete, so...)
He agreed, and they piddled around with it at first. Because they were producing CD-ROM catalogs for some big companies, though, eventually, they produced some of the early web catalogs. Notably, a large catalog for 3M and a big catalog for Tesco. These were static sites, with no live database backend. (Nobody was doing that yet.)
Later, we added the ability to add in bits of interactive Javascript without any programming. This got MacroMedia interested, and they bought MediaShare. The ProductBase technology got rolled-into Dreamweaver.
Adobe later bought Macromedia.
Somewhere along the way, the templates seem to have become lost, while the ability to use bits of Javascript without having to do programming seems to have stayed. I've never used Dreamweaver, and so I always thought it had some kind of templating. Maybe that got put into some other Adobe product(s) instead. (I would think this is absolutely essential for producing print publications of any size.)
Unless I am mistaken, and templates are there hidden under a different name, somebody threw away something critical along the way, IMO. Because when I search on how to change, say, the <head> section of every page of your site with Dreamweaver, all I get are articles telling you how to do a mass edit using regexs. No suggestions that you should have used the apparently non-existent template capability.
-------
Middleman and other static site generators are great tools for creating static websites. However, they aren't terribly designer-friendly.
I suppose this should have been a separate post. It would be good to have a discussion of tools for managing large static sites.
Another option is that many CMSs have an option to generate a static site from their content.