Response title
This is preview!
- Screen name: creativecouple
creativecouple's Profile
4 Posts
159 Responses
2
Followers
Activity Trend
Last 30 days
- Last 30 days
- Date Interval
From Date : To Date :
Loading Chart...
Show:
- Expanded view
- List view
Private Message
- 08-Oct-2012 08:14 AM
- Forum: Developing jQuery Core
Due to the documentation of .promise() the created Deferred object will resolve when all actions bound to the collection have ended.jQuery's implementation does not behave like that! (version 1.6 up to 1.8.2)The documentation still leaves space for two possible interpretations. Both are violated.Interpretation #1: For multiple elements the .promise() object resolves once all elements are not being animated at the same time.The minimal counter example for that meaning is:- $('#foo').fadeOut(100);
- var deferred = $('#foo, #bar').promise();
- $('#bar').fadeOut(200);
In this example the Deferred is resolved after 100ms. Due to interpretation #1 it must resolve after 200ms.So let's come to the second possible interpretation.Interpretation #2: The .promise()-created object resolves once all currently queued animations have ended.The minimal counter example is:- $('#foo').fadeOut(100);
- var deferred = $('#foo').promise();
- $('#foo').fadeIn(200);
In this example the Deferred is resolved after 300ms. Due to interpretation #2 it must resolve after 100ms already.As we see that both interpretations are wrong - which is the right one?Or can we modify the documentation to explain it with more details?Peter- 06-Aug-2012 10:27 AM
- Forum: Developing jQuery Core
Hi,On http://jsfiddle.net/creativecouple/3Y63M/ I have an example with .promise(type).There is one element animated (.delay) with the default queue 'fx' and the other one with another queue 'foo'.First question, informative:- Is it intended that non-default queues don't start on their own like 'fx' does? I always have to start it manually via .dequeue('foo').Second question, the problem:- Why does .promise(type) don't wait for the non-default queue to finish?This is the same for any jQuery version from 1.6.0 up to 1.8.b2Have fun!
- creativecouple- Hi there,In this forum I find many issues with the delay-functionality from jquery core.It seems that in most cases it can be replaced by the .wait() function from the jquery-timing plugin.Whoever troubles with .delay() should give this plugin a try.It supports delaying and scheduling of all jQuery methods - from core and any plugin.You can also schedule the methods with an interval using the .repeat() function.See more examples and documentation at jquery-timing plugin.Have fun!- creativecouple
- 26-May-2012 02:08 AM
- Forum: Developing jQuery Plugins
Hi there,I just put a jquery plugin to github which I was using in my private projects for a long time now.jquery-timing provides easy-to-use methods to define timeouts and intervals just in the line with all your jQuery stuff. The goal of this plugin was to write less and do more by avoiding the usage of window.setTimeout() and window.setInterval().See creativecouple.github.com/jquery-timing for examples and complete reference.If you like the simplicity and straightforwardness of the following lines then you should check out the plugin:- // add some CSS class and have it removed half a second later
- $('.mySelection').addClass('loading').wait(500).removeClass('loading');
- // make a text blinking twice a second the whole time
- $('.mySelection').repeat(250).toggleClass('blink');
- // remove DOM elements one by one until they're all gone
- $('span').repeat(500).first().text("I'm dying...").wait(400).remove().until();
Have fun!- creativecouple- «Prev
- Next »
Moderate user : creativecouple
© 2013 jQuery Foundation
Sponsored by and others.
