RE: [Jquery-dev] $.load()
> Is there any reason not to refactor 'load' to be invoked
RE: [Jquery-dev] FX module
> Tests showing the performance issue:
RE: [Jquery-dev] FX module
> Doing a rewrite with a good coneptioning phase would help
FX module
Hi devs, I'd like to mention the plan for a fx module rewrite. I think Brandon mentioned it earlier. The current fx module has: - good IE performance - bad FF performance - very hackish and nearly impssible to work on, as John's inline comment implies Tests showing the performance issue: http://jquery.com/dev/bugs/bug/260/ According to those tests, jQuery has good performance in IE and Scriptacolous has good performance on Firefox. It should be possible to create effects that perform well on both,
jQuery methods plugin
Hi devs, in the plugin repository, there is still jquery.methods.js. I wonder if anyone actually uses that, or if it could be removed in favor of the other array and string methods. -- Jörn Zaefferer http://bassistance.de _______________________________________________ Jquery-dev mailing list Jquery-dev@bassistance.de http://lists.bassistance.de/mailman/listinfo/jquery-dev
Mistake in 1.0.4 release notes
There is a mistake in the release notes concerning $.ajax' processData option, caused by flawed docs. I tried to fix them, it says now this: (Boolean) processData - By default, data passed in to the data option as an object * other as string will be processed and transformed into a query string, fitting to * the default content-type "application/x-www-form-urlencoded". If you want to send * DOMDocuments, set this option to false. It looks like John already fixed the blog post, but still, the usage
RE: [Jquery-dev] jQuery 1.0.4 release?
I'll rejoin the fray here in a day or two, once I finish some stuff here at work. I have patches ready for the duplicate tbody problem and the XML #id bug but need to create some more test cases for them. -----Original Message----- From: jquery-dev-bounces@bassistance.de [mailto:jquery-dev-bounces@bassistance.de] On Behalf Of Jörn Zaefferer Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 2:58 PM To: jquery-dev@bassistance.de Subject: Re: [Jquery-dev] jQuery 1.0.4 release? Dave Methvin schrieb:
Jquery.org website
Hey guys, JÖrn has brought me on to this list to get development moving on the jQuery website. I'm taking the time on my bus ride home to type this up on the blackberry so some of it might ramble on and make little sense now, but if we work on it, these details can be fleshed out. First up, a little background. I started getjquery.org to bring about a community for both experienced jQuery members, and newbies to come together, but john got in touch with me to look at rather than working on seperate
css("height"/"width") and height()/width()
Hi devs, there was already some discussion about css("height"/"width") and height()/width(). I think Brandon proposed to let css() return values as specified in stylesheet and height/width as computed values. Please correct me if I got that wrong. Anyway: How to handle this (in 1.1.)? -- Jörn Zaefferer http://bassistance.de _______________________________________________ Jquery-dev mailing list Jquery-dev@bassistance.de http://lists.bassistance.de/mailman/listinfo/jquery-dev
jQuery 1.0.4 release?
Hi devs, I think it's time for jQuery 1.0.4. It's still a long way till 1.1, and we'd want to avoid more "that is already fixed in svn" responses. Any objections? -- Jörn Zaefferer http://bassistance.de _______________________________________________ Jquery-dev mailing list Jquery-dev@bassistance.de http://lists.bassistance.de/mailman/listinfo/jquery-dev
RE: [Jquery-dev] jQuery 1.0.4 release?
> Ok, this is because .find(expr,function) was removed. > Why was this removed? Because it was undocumented? Well, the vote was unanimous for taking it out; the problem was that the voter turnout was low--me. :-) http://www.nabble.com/nextUntil-and-other-DOM-traversing-manipulting-methods -tf2671765.html#a7452247 > This is a change that should've waited until the 1.1 > release - and at least some form of consensus. This also brings up the issue of how to transition out some of the features in common
FW: [jQuery] Simulate getElementById()
I figured I'd switch this over to the dev list.
Welcome
Welcome to the jquery-dev mailing list! The purpose of this list is to discuss the state and further development of jQuery. The public mailing list is the wrong place these kind of discussion, but there has to be a better communication between the developers. The issues I'd like to talk about: - What is the status of the jQuery website? Who is actually working on it? How can other be involved? Why does it seem to be all secret and private? - Why isn't anyone else contributing to the jQuery core?