[jQuery] Concern: quality of plugin library submissions

[jQuery] Concern: quality of plugin library submissions


I'm finding what seems like a lot of plugins that:
a. Don't follow the structure of the 'home page, documentation,
demonstration' pattern
b. Have dead links to the code/docs
c. Plugins that are marginally 'jqueryized' (for instance a Dynamic
Drive component I came across with a minor reference to jquery but the
bulk of it's code is run of the mill javascript.
d. Seem to be poorly described as to intent/purpose
e. Seem to be quickly-knocked-out and/or not well thought out, almost
as if for the sake of just getting something published with their name
on it.
Now I may just be overly critical, since I don't see any discussion on
this. But as the plugin list has grown, it's getting more and more
difficult to find quality information.
Well, there's my 2 cents... Fire away!
As a 'well what do you suggest be done about it?' starting point -
perhaps a link to 'suggest improvement' that would email the developer
or others, could be added? Or a simpler 'does not conform' link that
simply marks the plugin project pages as needing cleanup.
Perhaps a way for the general community to directly work on the
plugins documentation to cleanup the deficiencies? Tough, that one
because most link off to someone's personal webspace, I know.
Anyway I hope this is taken in the spirit of 'making it better' and
not idle griping. I fear jQuery may be getting smothered by it's very
success.