jQuery Forum

Well, today we work within the syntax of valid CSS. Our templates contain "default" values and work out of the box without any processing. That's a pretty big difference from LESS. We could have our LESS styles parsed client-side since we know that JS is required for all of our demos, but it is a change in philosophy. Also, with the CSS Cascading Variables Module being worked on, I feel like people should just polyfill the eventual standard.

I think having a .less (or .sass) alternative to ThemeRoller would be of huge plus. I am not debating if UI-demos should use client or server side processing. I am talking about the way UI is distributed. The goal is to produce a .css file which has specific dimensions and color-codes and be able to repeat this during project development. ThemeRoller is just not well suited for that.

Since I discovered less css my life has changed!